I generally agree with the conclusion that the focus should be on judiciary independence, not trying to control/limit the public opinion.
The focus should really be on strengthening the judiciary infrastructure (institutions, framework, etc) among others.
Transparency of the law and how the decision was reached would likely reduce the impact of mob rule.

In the rules related to “…past discussions of the relation between media and the judicature”, the writer writes the following:

“1. How can supervision trough media be strengthened in the implementation of the law? The judicial power is a public power that the state exercises. Therefore the judiciary must be accountable to the citizens and subject itself to public supervision. Otherwise it will – like any unconditioned power – become vulnerable to abuse. ”

Sorry my fault if my reading comprehension skills is a bit weak but is He Weifang aware that what he writes on the judiciary can easily be applied to the CCP?
Or more likely IT IS directed towards the Party as the judicial (as well as the media and state for that matter – just to cover them all, let me also include the military) come under the guidance of the Party.

No wonder he was transferred to Xinjiang….